Crap disguised as art

I have a paper due next week. What does this mean for you, my loyal readers (anybody, anybody, Bueller?)? It means that I will do absolutely anything to procrastinate. In one of my attempts to procrastinate today, I came across some photos belonging to a DJ who will remain anonymous (not because I don't want to call him out, but because he's some local DJ from Nowhereville, OH). This photo gallery is of limited size, meaning that the DJ had to select his three favorite pictures to post. Given this constraint, one would think that the DJ would select the best pictures available. This was not the case.

Our little DJ friend had posted only blurry pictures. One (presumably) of himself spinning records, and two others of people dancing (presumably) to his music. Now I have a great appreciation for modern art and an even greater appreciation for the difficulty of taking pictures in nightclub settings (after all, I did spend 6 months doing so professionally), but there is absolutely no excuse to post three indistinct pictures. Thanks to digital cameras, we now have the ability to delete bad pictures and take more! It's brilliant!

I'm sure that our little DJ friend thinks that blurry pictures make him look edgy and artistic, but let's face it, whoever took the pictures was probably too drunk to hold the camera still. And after seeing the drunken pictures, the DJ was probably thrilled at the less than stellar results, given that they allow him to cover up the fact that there were only two people dancing in the entire club.

So let's face it Mr. DJ, you're not edgy, you're retarded. Blurry pictures are not artistic, they're blurry.

Hugs and kisses,
The Bitter Libertarian